Sulfonylureas as second line drugs in type 2 diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic events: population based cohort study.

Antonios Douros, Sophie Dell'Aniello, Oriana Hoi Yun Yu, Kristian B Filion, Laurent Azoulay, Samy Suissa

REVIEW


04 December 2018

This is an important study because there is a tendency to switch to SUs when metformin does not do enough to control glucose because they're so cheap. The increased risk of mortality and MI with SUs has been confirmed in this study. 


RELEVANCE 4
INNOVATIVENESS 5
APPLICABILITY 3
OVERALL 4

PAPER DETAILS


TITLE

Sulfonylureas as second line drugs in type 2 diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic events: population based cohort study.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE
To assess whether adding or switching to sulfonylureas is associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, cardiovascular death, all cause mortality, and severe hypoglycaemia, compared with remaining on metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN
Population based cohort study.

SETTING
General practices contributing data to the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

PARTICIPANTS
Patients with type 2 diabetes initiating metformin monotherapy between 1998 and 2013.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Using the prevalent new-user cohort design we matched 1:1 patients adding or switching to sulfonylureas with those remaining on metformin monotherapy on high-dimensional propensity score, haemoglobin A1c, and number of previous metformin prescriptions. The two groups were compared using Cox proportional hazards models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the study outcomes.

RESULTS
Among 77 138 metformin initiators, 25 699 added or switched to sulfonylureas during the study period. During a mean follow-up of 1.1 years, sulfonylureas were associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (incidence rate 7.8 6.2 per 1000 person years, hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.56), all cause mortality (27.3 21.5, 1.28, 1.15 to 1.44), and severe hypoglycaemia (5.5 0.7, 7.60, 4.64 to 12.44) compared with continuing metformin monotherapy. There was a trend towards increased risks of ischaemic stroke (6.7 5.5, 1.24, 0.99 to 1.56) and cardiovascular death (9.4 8.1, 1.18, 0.98 to 1.43). Compared with adding sulfonylureas, switching to sulfonylureas was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 2.24) and all-cause mortality (1.23, 1.00 to 1.50). No differences were observed for ischaemic stroke, cardiovascular death, or severe hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS
Sulfonylureas as second line drugs are associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, all cause mortality, and severe hypoglycaemia, compared with remaining on metformin monotherapy. Continuing metformin when introducing sulfonylureas appears to be safer than switching.



AUTHOR(S)

Antonios Douros, Sophie Dell'Aniello, Oriana Hoi Yun Yu, Kristian B Filion, Laurent Azoulay, Samy Suissa,

JOURNAL

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

PLACE

England